Perinatal Care at the threshold of viability

Part I Resource planning for Neonatal Care Units: clinical outcomes and resource needs
Part II (Good) Practice Models to handle Ethical, Organizational, and Social Challenges
Duration: May 2017 – November 2017
Suggested by: Representatives of federal states
Publications:
LBI-HTA Project report No. 97a: https://eprints.aihta.at/1146/
LBI-HTA Project report No. 97b: https://eprints.aihta.at/1148/
Language: English (with German summary)
Background:
Due to medical advances in neonatal intensive care, the survival rate of extremely preterm infants has increased in the last two decades, whereby infants born after the 22 week of gestation have a chance for survival. However, the outcomes of extremely early born (defined as week 22 +0 days until 25 + 6 days of gestation) are still poor with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Apart from additional treatment efforts for preterm infants, the rising number of survivors increases the resource needs and costs for care and support at neonatal care units. These organizational and financial consequences need to be accounted and planned for when allocating health care budgets.
Aim:
The aim of this project is to provide a decision support for resource planning of neonatal intensive care units in Austria.
Part I: We aim to provide evidence on the clinical outcomes of extremely preterm infants as well as insights into the resources needed in neonatal care units (NICU) for the provision of adequate care for preterm infants, to inform health care planning.
Part II: We aim to provide information on “good practice” models of decision-making procedures (choosing between active vs palliative treatments), the social factors that serve as the basis for making the decision whether to prolong life (parents’ age, educational background, or socio-economic status) and the ethical challenges with interventions at the threshold of viability. Furthermore, we aim to consult experts from Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in the Austrian health care context.
Research questions:
Part I: Resource planning for Neonatal Care Units: clinical outcomes and resource needs
-
What are the clinical outcome parameters of children born in the 22, 23, 24, and 25 week?
- What resources are needed in neonatal care units for the provision of adequate care for preterm infants to inform health care planning?
PICO: (Inclusion criteria)
Population |
Extremely preterm infants (born before week 26: 22 + 0 – 25 +6) |
Intervention |
Active treatment: Surfactant therapy, tracheal intubation, ventilatory support (CPAP, bag-mask ventilation, mechanical ventilation) parenteral nutrition, epinephrine (or other adrenaline), chest compression |
Comparators |
No intervention, palliative care, Preterm infants >26 weeks of gestation |
Outcomes |
|
Setting |
Neonatal care units |
Study type |
Clinical Outcomes: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, HTA assessments Resource needs: no study limitation |
Publication period |
Clinical Outcomes: 2013-2017 Resource needs: 2007-2017 |
Languages |
German/English |
Methods
To answer research question 1) we will systematically review the current literature on clinical outcomes of survival and survival without impairment in relation to gestation week (week 22+ 0 until 25+6) by analysing and updating evidence from recent systematic reviews.
This report will not assess costs of resource needs, costs of interventions. Furthermore, we will not assess comparative effectiveness and safety of individual interventions.
Research questions Part II: (Good) Practice Models to handle Ethical, Organizational, and Social Challenges
- What are the “good practice” models in the decision-making procedures (between active vs palliative treatments) that are currently implemented?
- Are there social factors that serve as the basis for the decision to prolong life (such as parents’ age, educational background, or socio-economic status)?
- How are the social and ethical challenges at the threshold of viability being handled in Austrian NICUs?
MIP (methodology, issue, participants): (Inclusion criteria)
Methodology |
Include empirical studies. Both quantitative and qualitative studies - surveys, in-depth interviews, questionnaires, etc. |
Issue |
Limit of viability, threshold of viability, border of viability, children born at 22 to 25 week of gestation, extremely preterm birth, gestational age 22+0 to 25+6, end of life treatment, “best practice”/”good practice” models of decision-making, social factors, ethics, ethical/moral challenges/dilemmas |
Participants |
parents, doctors (physicians), ethical council, ethical committee |
Setting |
Neo-natal intensive care units (NICU) |
Publication period |
1990-2017 |
Languages |
German/English |
Methods:
Part II of the project will be answered by mixed methods.
To answer research questions 1) and 2), a systematic search in six databases (Medline via Ovid, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CRD, CINAHL) will be performed and complemented by a hand search to review information on “good practice” models of NICU decision-making procedures and social factors that influence the related decision-making.
To answer research question 3), interviews with Austrian NICU experts will be conducted and followed by a critical review using the EUnetHTA additional assessment elements checklist.
Time schedule: to be finished until November 2017
Period |
Task |
April/ May |
Scoping |
May |
Literature search, hand search |
June |
Literature selection, contacting interview participants |
July |
Literature analysis, data extraction (Part I and II), |
July- August |
Conducting of interviews (July/August) and interview transcription and analyses |
September |
Drafting of the report |
October |
Internal review and external review |
November |
Finalizing, layout |