New Reports

Assessment of Interventions Addressing Social Media Use among Children and Adolescents. A Systematic Review and Ethical Analysis

What measures can help protect children and young people from the potential risks of social media? A recent AIHTA analysis shows that there is currently no robust evidence to reliably demonstrate the effectiveness of specific regulatory approaches. This makes ethical considerations, awareness-raising, and accompanying evaluation all the more important.

Smartphone with social media symbols. A hand stops the symbols, illustrating control over social media content.

Social media has become an integral part of the daily lives of children and adolescents. Internationally, there is growing concern about possible negative effects on mental health, sleep, wellbeing, and social development.

AIHTA examined what measures selected countries have introduced or are considering to protect children and adolescents, what scientific evidence exists on their benefits and risks, and what is known about their ethical implications. The measures reviewed included age-based access restrictions, partial restrictions on platform features, content, and usage time, as well as family- and education-based measures.

The key finding is that current evidence can neither reliably confirm nor rule out the effectiveness of any particular regulatory measure. This lack of robust evidence therefore shifts the burden of justification onto ethical-normative arguments. Moreover, any potential effectiveness depends on successful implementation, particularly reliable age verification. Public awareness campaigns targeting children, adolescents, and parents/guardians, as well as an independent, pre-specified evaluation framework, should be conducted alongside such measures.

 

AIHTA Project Report No. 185